![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: love u icon, online icons com, cute crystal icon, photoshop 6 icon, virtuawin iconsIt is necessary, that they have been made in expectation of the same number of the externalEvents as if different people based the plans for the contradicting One another expectations no set of external events could allow To carry out all of them together. And secondly, in the company based on an exchange, Plans of each person in a significant part will consist of actions, Means that plans of various individuals should be in a sense Compatible that, at least presumably, they were capable all of them To realise. the individual purposes, why in sociology, desires., discrepancy terms, how much to me It is known, compatibility and Incompatibility, Me for a long time surprised and it was not done regular attempts to analyse the public Relations in conformity or, speaking differently, as Part of the data on which basis any person begins to make plans, Will consist of expectations of a certain line of action of other people, for Compatibility of different plans essentially important, that plans of one person Contained those actions which form the data for plans of other. In traditional treatment of the equilibrium analysis this difficulty is possible, Apparently, partially to bypass by means of an assumption that the data in the form of curves The demand, reflecting tastes of individuals and the technical facts, are equally given To all participants also that realisation of actions by them on the basis of same Preconditions anyhow will lead to mutual adaptation of their plans. Often It was underlined that the difficulty created by that actions of one person Act as the data for other, actually as such way not It is overcome and that in a way the similar chain of reasoning represents Itself a vicious circle. However till now, seemingly, escaped attention that All this procedure involves mess of the even more general property, in Which the mentioned moment represents only a special case and which It is caused by an ambiguity of the concept "datum" - "given". The data, under By which the objective facts identical to all people here are meant, Obviously are not equivalent to the data which serve as a basic point for Tautological transformations of Pure Logic of the Choice. There "data" meant The facts, and only what were present at a character head, and Only this subjective interpretation of concept "given" did such statements It is necessary true. "Datum" means given, known to the considered ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|