![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: com icon for, infranview icon, my valentine icons, icon bar, icon calendar5. A short way in it: four temperaments«Greetings, I intuitive it and I here to help you». In it to learn to understand in it and it, it and intuitions, and in other preferences is only the first step to understanding of or another's psychological type. When you start combination of preferences, for example, it with logic or it with rationality, you receive a combination of two preferences of behaviour which where is richer and more difficult, than any of separately taken preferences. When you add the third and fourth preferences, the situation becomes complicated even more. So it is possible to understand, for example, in it, intuitions, to the logician and rationality separately but to be at a deadlock, if business reaches that understanding that such type ENTJ. For the aid to studying it we offer here simple means which we name system of temperaments. The temperament is a special two-letter combination (the system has been developed by David Kejrsi and Merilin Bejts, authors of books on it. Temperaments are useful for using, as for this purpose you will need to know only two letters from a four-letter code of the person, but thus with sufficient accuracy to define its behaviour. So even if to you it is not clear that gives a combination of all four letters, the two-letter temperament helps to foresee, in what way the person is trained and trains itself, supervises over others, strikes up acquaintances and communications, earns money and communicates with associates. Finding-out of preferences of sensorno-intuitive pair will be the first help for a temperament establishment. This results from the fact that distinction in ways of reception of the information is a starting point for the majority of contacts between people. Without that understanding as this or that person receives the information, it will be extremely difficult to you to communicate with it as everyone believes that the facts are that it seems the facts to it. If one sees wood, and another — the trees, everyone will consider that the rights it (so it and is), and here trust to the facts received by another, at it will not be. For it the tree is and there is a tree; for the intuitionalist the tree is a part of system, organic whole under the name "wood". Hence, when the intuitionalist sees a tree, it already casts to it an image of wood. Now we take a question on a thin or semifull cup. It and the intuitionalist will respond to it differently: The intuitionalist who everywhere sees possibilities, will be more optimistical while it, concentrated first of all on real (instead of on possible) a state of affairs, is not too inclined to see that «can be». And before the person of any type will make the decision, whether it be in logic or ethical style, it is necessary for it to receive the facts irrespective of the fact which expression — internal (it) or external (it) this decision will receive. ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|