Your cart is empty.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: rude icons, blue glass icons, animated web icons, icon accelerant perf leather jacket, peace sign aim iconsThe more general assumptions with which there begins the Pure Logic of the Choice. To meIt is represented that the basic differences two. First, assumptions with which there begins the Pure Logic of the Choice, are the facts, Being, as far as we know, the general for any human thinking. It is possible to consider them as the axioms defining and establishing borders of sphere, In which we are capable to understand, or to reconstruct in mind, Processes of thinking of other people. Hence, they have the universal Applicability in that sphere which us interests, - though, of course, a question about Borders of this sphere in concreto Without delay concern type of human activity (that that we ordinary We name "rational" or even simply "conscious" unlike "Instinctive"), rather than to concrete conditions at what it is made. However assumptions, or hypotheses which we should enter when we want To explain social processes, relations of thinking of the individual to the external concern To the world. They are connected with a question, in what measure and how its knowledge Reach conformity with the external facts. And such hypotheses necessarily should To take the form of assertions about causal relationships, how experience creates Knowledge. Secondly, in sphere of Pure Logic of the Choice our analysis can be made Comprehensive, otherwise, here we can develop the formal device, Covering all conceivable situations. Unlike it auxiliary hypotheses Necessarily should have selective character, that is it is necessary for us To select from an uncountable variety of possible situations such ideal Types as which for any of several reasons we consider especially relevant for Conditions of the real world. [The differentiation conducted here can help in Overcoming of old disagreements between economists and sociologists apropos Roles which "ideal types" play economic theory arguments. Sociologists often underlined that usual procedures of an economic theory Include an assumption about certain ideal types, whereas Economists-theorists indicated that their argument carries so Universal character that it is not required to resort to any "the ideal ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|