![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: hypnotoad aim icon, icons on ifonz, desktop icons pack, bad ass icon, windows xp black iconsLet's conduct in vain searches of the developed proof [for example: G. vonSchulze-Gaevernitz, Der Grossbetrieb (1892); J. Schoenhof, The Economy of High Wages (1893), pp. 33, 279; K. Brentano, Hours and Wages in Their Relation to Production (1894); J.A.Hobson, The Evolution of Modern Capitalism (1894), p. 81]. Rather complete examination can be found in some German Publications of last time. [See, in particular: H.Neisser, "Lohnhithe und Beschitftigungsgrad im Marktgleichgewicht ", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. XXXVI (October, 1932) and A.Kahler, Die Theorie der Arbeiterfreisetzung durch die Maschine (Leipzig, 1933), pp. 75 ff. To me follows, possibly to add that Partially thanks to professor Najsseru I have received acknowledgement of the Convictions in that this assertion was widely accepted; as, when Simultaneously with the advent of its article I (in the article in the same journal) am strong It was confused in this question, it, at once having found for me, has orally indicated on This mess.] however when some years ago in England professor Hiks Used this assertion in the "wages Theories", it-it Shouv in The review of this book has formulated the objection which has become by the standard: while norm Percent remains invariable, the general change of wages will influence on Cost value at various methods of production in an identical proportion (That is conclusive), and that, hence, it cannot change their comparative Advantages (that from here does not follow) [J.R.Hicks, The Theory of Wages (1932), chap. ix, and the review of this book of J. F.Shouvom in itconomic Journal, XLIII (September, 1933), 471]. Later professor Hiks has cleaned all chapter with the scarified Fragment that, possibly, meant its failure of this assertion [J.R.Hicks, "Wages and Interest: The Dynamic Problem", Economic Journal, Vol. XLV (September, 1935)]. During even more later time it-it Kaldor in the article, on which We should refer subsequently, recognising a principle, seemingly, has limited Its action is enough special conditions [N. Kaldor, "Capital Intensity ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|