![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: girls next door icons, icon dissapears after, icon flash, visual styles icons, raid icons in partyFirms, it is easy to to present. Therefore give from distinctions in the incomeDifferent firms it is reversible to distinctions in norms of return of different parts of the capital Any one firm at precisely same rise in price. Submission about Rate of turnover separate both giving in to measurement and norm of return for the different Capital parts (it is unconditional, meeting, though, possibly, never Receiving exact definitions in practice) are assumed by estimation possibility The limiting contribution of each of these parts to a product. In turn, it, as Well-known, depends on possibility to vary a proportion in what can To be combined various forms of the capital. In following section we will explain, Why we consider that in significant cases this variability is enough for us It is great even during the short period. While we will move further, Having assumed that and that we, hence, can define it speed Turn-over and a limiting product of any part of the capital of firm and, hence, Factor of profitableness received from it. [Dr. Houtri in the review of mine Works "the Pure theory of the capital" (Economic Journal, June-September, 1941, p. 286) tries to conduct distinction between measurement of the income of any investment in Terms of "potential pure economy of costs" and its measurement in terms The limiting investment in end production, asserting that whereas possibility For the first will be always, the second will be possible only in the exclusive Cases. But these two approaches actually are simply two different aspects of one and The same problem and hardly any of them it is much more useful than other: a difference Between them consists simply that in the first case we suppose that The parity between various factors cit to be corrected thus, That production volume will remain to constants, whereas in second we We suppose that to constants the quantity of all resources, except one is, and We observe influence of change in quantity of this kind of resources on volume ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|