![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: bmp icons, adrian pasdar icons, mandalorian icon, 256x256 icon, headbanging buddy iconsEfforts of the businessman), connected with increase in volume of production duringSo short period - that is if to include costs of increase in issue Certain rate in incremental costs. But if we make it, Incremental costs will not be more unequivocally connected with issue volume, and We should consider separate curves of incremental costs for each Growth rate of the output, becoming all more abruptly in process of transition to more To fast growth rates while the curve of incremental costs does not become Perpendicular for instant increase in issue.], it is simply incorrect in The short-term period, though dogmatic belief that the prices always Should be equal to incremental costs, became, possibly, the reason big Messes in this sphere. The second position has a direct bearing more to To discussed theme. Submission that if the offer of money at the given norm of percent is Absolutely elastic at not elastic investment demand, norm of return, At which equality of a supply and demand begins to be reached, will be To be defined exclusively by the first of these two factors (that is the offer Money), it is removed by analogy from this the general rule that if demand volume Or volume of the offer something are completely elastic at a determined price, From here inevitably follows, what exactly this price and will be established in the market. However, Though the similar formulation is fair enough, so far as concerns demand and The offer, expressed in "real" terms, it does not consider the essential Differences of a case in point where considered "price" is the relation between the prices Two groups of the blessings (work and consumer goods), whereas the offer, Being infinitely elastic, concerns not to any of these two blessings, and Only to money which at first should be it on one of them. At It that fact that any increase in a monetary outlay at one kind is ignored The blessings it will be inevitable to cause increase in a monetary outlay at other. When it was above said that we face a nonequilibrium condition, it as Time also meant that we should deal with two groups of forces, ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|