![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: flag icon, harry potter book icons, lauridsen icon, shoop da whoop icon, camera icon os xHaving separated original problems from problems hidden and personal, we had an opportunity to take up the problems of Dzhennifer and to solve them. But try to undertake we problems Norin, we would be expected most likely by disappointment. It quite could mind that time it copes with job it quite justifies its behaviour in working hours, and this objection would be quite reasonable. At the same time it would shade such real problem, as dishonesty and deceits of Dzhennifer.As we already spoke, the perception of ethics is defined by type of the person. As the analogy under the name "House", the most part of that the stranger it where it is more closely connected with our own ethical problems seems to us shows. Thereupon the important step for the permission of any ethical difficulty is carrying out of borders between real problems of the organisation and the personal ethical questions which are not concerning business. Problems professional and ethical Here one more case, this time from a life it communities. Some years ago one woman, ENFJ — we will name as its Gledis, — has addressed in Association it with charge in unethical behaviour of colleague Uolta (also ENFJ). It has declared that Uolt subjected to sneers some typological distinctions that seemed to it the insult of certain types of the person. This case took place on the presentation, which Uolt spent together with the partner. According to ethical instructions of organisation Gledis next day has talked over about it with Uoltom, having declared to it that he has too taken a great interest. It has explained that its formulations had comic and frivolous character, and audience reaction showed that they and have been understood by appropriate amount. However its arguments looked unpersuasively so Gledis has decided to write about It to committee AT on ethics. In the letter of Gledis referred to literal statements of Uolta by which It was diligently reserved at its seminar. Its extracts have appeared detailed enough, though and not in all: ostensibly doubtful remarks from the ethical point of view which she has attributed Uoltu, actually have been made by its partner. ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|