![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: cute buddy icons for aim, audio icons, nicktran com icons, icons programs, wireless icon trayPersonal thrift at all does not mention the general economicSavings "companies, but only defines, what share of the general savings will be To be carried out by me or someone other. We will show, how thrift of one Company parts forces its other part to live outside the limits of its income (190) ... The majority of modern economists denies that consumption can Sometimes to be insufficient. Whether we can find any acting Economic force which could induce company to such excessive Thrift and if there are such forces, whether that supplies the mechanism Trade of constraining influence? We will show, first, that in each Which, naturally, induces to excessive thrift, and secondly that Ostensibly mortgaged in the mechanism of trade of "brake" or at all Act, or are insufficient for prevention of a large damage to trade (191)... The Short answer which has given Rikardo on assertions of Maltusa and - , apparently, has been accepted by the majority of the latest economists as Quite sufficient. "Production is always purchased for production or services. Money is only the tool by means of which the exchange is carried out. Therefore The production increase is always accompanied by respective increase Abilities to acquisition and consumption, and overproduction to be not Can ". Ricardo. Principles of Political Economy, p. 362 (192). it and Memmeri knew that the percent is not that other, as a payment for Use of money (193). They also well enough knew that them Opponents will refer to as if there should be "such falling Norms of percent (or profits) which will constrain savings and Will restore a correct proportion between production and consumption "(194). In the answer they indicated that "if profit falling induces people to save up It is less, it should be shown by two ways - or declining them to spend It is more, or to make less "(195). Concerning the first case they Proved that if the profit falls, all income of company decreases, and "We do not suppose, that when the income average falls, people Tested prompting to consumption increase only because the award for Thrift has accordingly decreased ". As to the second ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|