![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: 1950 fashion icon, invaderzim icons, interfacelift com icons, weatherpanel icons, icon file in vistaCosts at the expense of economy on scale always and everywhere were caused by a survivalThe big enterprises (short of conglomerates), and sometimes they were The reason of their occurrence. And on the contrary, the big enterprises always played Essential role in development of technologies though the nature of this influence was Subject of wide discussions. Some assert that the big enterprises Work of more enterprising and resourceful men; others assert that It is literally weight the important inventions have been made by the big laboratories Huge corporations. Usually economists try to resolve this question, comparing costs of corporations Different dimensional categories on researches and workings out (research and development), comparing Their strategy of hiring of operating personnel and to the politician of acquisition of patents. Results on a number of the statistical and theoretical reasons usually happen The dual. Interbranch statistical comparisons of costs for research and development in big and small Corporations are unreliable because such costs depend on potential Existing technologies. Potential possibilities of branch technologies Than when they start to become outdated. In branches where this potential is evaluated It is low, neither big, nor small corporations will not spend much for research and development. Therefore results of statistical comparisons can easily appear Deformed at the expense of a high share of corporations from branches with the high In technological potential. To eliminate such distortion it is hard. Modern business strategy sharply complicate even intrabranch comparison Levels of costs for research and development in the big and small corporations. A share of incomes from The sales, spent by the small specialised manufacturer of cars on Research and development, can surpass level of costs in the big company simply therefore, That for service of small group of enthusiasts it can be required Rather it volume of researches and workings out, than at service The mass buyers showing rather average interest to a product. When two The enterprises essentially differ among themselves on the size and on level Costs for research and development, they can differ so hardly the business Strategy and economic functions and to compare them it is simply senseless. Statistical researches reliably testify that the enterprises of all ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|