![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: photographic folder icons, hide login icon, animated button icons, band emo funny icons, web icons phoneTo define, whether the risk on which it had to go in the past has been justified? AndWhether there will be its relation to risky projects same, as though it Risked the property? Let's consider at first as its success or failure will be checked. The first Question: whether it has succeeded in preservation of value of the resources entrusted it. But even The best businessmen incur losses from time to time, and sometimes even very much The serious. Whether it is necessary to blame the businessman that its capital has become outdated Under the influence of innovations or shifts in demand? As it is necessary to define, whether had It is right to go on this or that risk? Whether the one who never suffers is Losses as never risks, by all means person acting As much as possible in interests of company? Unconditionally, the aspiration will take place To prefer the safe project to the risky. However risky and even purely speculative tradings will here not less Are important, than under capitalism. Specialisation on function of execution of risk Professional speculators the goods will be the same necessary form of division Work, as well as today. But properly to define the size of the capital of the speculator and To nominate its compensation? As it is long possible to allow successful in the past To the businessman to incur losses? If punishment for losses is loss Positions of Upredprinimateljay, whether becomes almost inevitable that probability Losses will act as constraining means so powerfully that will move Prospect of reception of the greatest profits? Under capitalism capital loss Also can mean loss of the status of the capitalist. But to this constraining Means is resisted always by appeal of possibility of a prize. At Socialism of it cannot be. It is quite admissible even that the general unwillingness Start any risky business could to finish norm of percent Practically to zero. But whether will bring it benefit to company? If it has occurred Simply because of saturation of all absolutely reliable channels of investment, ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|