![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: icon size 48x48, alan rickman image, sitar image, mobile icon, moving computer iconsOthers that its communication with value of an end-product is indiscernible. This ruptureCommunications between efforts of the worker, value of a product and compensation does Impossible an establishment of satisfactory communications between labour efforts and Their payment. At a present status of knowledge of psychology of groups it is obviously possible To achieve that communication between work, quality of a product and its value The collective will be realised even better, than by the separate person. But even in Japan our representations about possibilities of group psychology it is far not Completely are still realised in practice of management by factories. Today not It is necessary to doubt that collectivisation of relations between the worker and Product of its work switches on costs, which at an estimation of factory system It is necessary to write down in the debit. The factory system has appeared also incompatible with practice, when workers Owned instruments of labour. Essential feature of this system that Great number of workers share, at least, a part Capacities, and in practice almost all equipment is used In common. From the very beginning in sharing there were buildings Factories, their water wheels or steam engines, system of pulleys and axes for Transfers of movement to machine tools. It was inevitable that the legal body owning The power equipment and building, owned also machine tools. Historically Otherwise could not be because separate workers simply had no Means for acquisition of machine tools, and, besides, accounting of the limiting Costs and the incomes, previous acquisition of each machine tool, should The property of workers on instruments of labour is important from the point of view of the economic Efficiency as workers are inclined to care better about personally it The belonging tool. Marx gave to this circumstance very big Value. He saw in it the main objection against capitalism, confirming, To the master, and is faster to the pupil or even - to the slave. The worker who is not owning tools ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|