![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: rpg maker vx icon, desktop icons are black, free pc icons, icon hooligan, icon library 32x32Paid off in the course of the year) exceeds cost of the capital of firm, it becomes clear,That if the internal norm of return should be identical to all firms, The profitableness factor will vary in inverse proportion to speed Turn-over. So, if we will designate internal norm of return as I, speed Turn-over as T and profitableness factor as M the relation between them will be To be expressed so: I = TM, Or M = I/T. If, for example, the internal norm makes 6 %, profitableness factor The firm turning the capital six times year, should make 1 %, Whereas the firm turning the capital only once in two years, should Will earn 12 % on all sales, and the firm turning the capital Only once in ten years, should have factor of profitableness of 60 %. For simplification of accounts compound interests are not taken anywhere into consideration. As the general increase will affect all these internal norms of return of various firms The prices, say, on 5 %? As such rise in price assumes the proportionate Increase in receipts from sale of any quantity of the goods, costs Which productions were not changed, it means obvious increase of factor Profitableness on each turn-over, equal to a gain of the prices. We will take three firms, only What is as an example. The first (with annual rate of turnover it = 6) will increase the factor of profitableness with 1 to 6 %; the second (with it = 1) - with 6 To 11 %; and the third (with it = 1/10) - with 60 to 65 %. Multiplying profitableness factor On corresponding rate of turnover, we receive new internal norms Returns: 6 it 6 = 36 % for the first firm, 1 it 11 = 11 % for second and 1/10 it 65 = 6,5 % for the third. the general effect of increase The prices for incomes of various firms also will vary at shifts in their structure The capital which we are going to consider more low., These figures show, of course At the assumptions accepted by us these distinctions of internal norms of return of different firms Cannot cause in a short space of time any change in available at them The capital (except as through a ploughing-back) - though effect, Which they would render in the real world on allocation of capital between ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|