![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: delerium fallen icons, icon suspensions, iconcool comxp icons htm, devianart icon, icon maker for osIt is impossible, but that any similar isolated measure will cause reactions,Crossing out its sense, also that any attempt to act consistently Will inevitably cause the further escalating of control measures, while all The economic activities will not appear under the power of the uniform centre. Within the limits of the given discussion of a socialism it is impossible to penetrate further into this quite Independent problem - about the state interference in Capitalist company. It is mentioned here only that clearly To tell that we exclude it from the reasonings. From our point of view, The standard analysis shows that such interference does not give alternative, In which advantage the rational choice or from which it is possible could be inclined Would be to expect the stable and satisfactory decision any of Problems because of which this interference also is undertaken Interventionismus (Jena, 1929), compare: L. von Mises. Here again, however, it is necessary to warn against incorrect interpretation. To tell that The partial planning mentioned by us is irrational, nevertheless is not equivalent To the assertion that the unique form of capitalism supposing the rational Protection, is complete laissez-faire in traditional understanding. Is not present any The bases to assume that historically given legal institutes by all means Uestestvennymiy in any sense are most. A recognition Private property principle at all does not mean that the concrete Delimitation of the contents of this right in that kind as it is established Existing laws, is it is unique the correct. A question, what most The suitable stable legal framework, capable to supply the most equal and The most effective action of a competitiveness, it is extremely important. It is necessary to recognise, to To regret that economists neglected it. But on the other hand, to recognise possibility of changes in a legal framework - not Means to admit possibility of other type of planning in that sense, in what we Till now used this word. Here there is an essential distinction, and it ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|