![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: despised icon bulletproof, hide icon tray, skullcandy icon headphones, icon in computer, icons 128x128Differentiation with dependence following from here on the power, purposefully itForming and altering. It is connected with great numbers only so far as, As in the large countries process of centralisation will be much faster To reach the moment when the conscious organisation from above will strangle the spontaneous The formations based on contacts closer and personal, than that Can exist in large units. It is no wonder that in a XIX-th century when these tendencies have distinctly declared for the first time about To itself, centralisation opposition became one of the basic cares Philosophers-individualists. This opposition is especially appreciable in works of two Great historians with whom I have allocated earlier as leading representatives True individualism in a XIX-th century, - Tokvilja and the lord of Acton; it has found Reflexion in their liking to the small countries and to the federal system of the big. Presently is even more bases to believe that the small countries soon Become the last oases saving free company. Perhaps, already Too late, to stop an inevitable course of the progressing Centralisation in larger countries, it is so far come on the way Creations of such mass company that despotism begins in long run To be represented by the last rescue. Whether the small countries can avoid at least Such destiny, depends on, whether there are they free from poison The nationalism which is both stimulus, and result all the same aspiration to The relation of individualism to the nationalism which is intellectually being not than Other as the twin of a socialism, deserves special discussion. Here I I can mention only that fundamental distinction meanwhile that in a XIX-th century Was considered as liberalism in the English-speaking world, and that carried this name On continent, closely related with their origin from true individualism and False rationalistic individualism accordingly. Only liberalism in English sense always resisted to centralisation, nationalism and To socialism whereas the liberalism dominating on continent, promoted ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|