![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: gtk icon python, funny pics icons, funny online icons, drag drop icon, axialis icon workshop professionalHow much, in their opinion, it is compatible to preservation behind the stateProperties on all material production assets. Though while it is impossible To refer to any published work with such approach, that It was found out from conversations and discussions, there is enough, apparently, that costed To consider its contents discussion of two later publications on this Theme see in the following chapter. In many respects these plans are very interesting. The general fundamental idea Consists in that there should be markets and a competitiveness between the independent Businessmen, or the managers, separate firms, and consequently, and Money prices of all blessings, intermediate or final, - as well as in present Company. However businessmen should not be holders used by them Production assets, but only paid government officials, Acting under the state instructions and making not for the sake of profit, and To have possibility to sell under the prices which only cover Costs. Is useless to ask, whether such scheme that usually qualifys still It is considered a socialism. As a whole it is represented that it can be carried to it. The question is more important, whether it still has any relation to planning. Apparently, she assumes planning not much more, than creation Rational legal framework for capitalism. If this scheme it was possible To realise in the pure state, so that a management of economic activities It has been entirely granted a competitiveness also planning also would be reduced to To maintenance of a stable framework in which concrete actions would be Are kept at the discretion of the individual initiative. In that case completely There would be no that sort of planning, or the centralised organisation Productions which as assume, will lead to more rational The organisations of human activity, than "a chaotic" competitiveness. However It is how much valid so, depends, of course, on in what degree The competitiveness - so to say, from a decisive question would be restored, Being here decisive in all senses, namely: I honour should be that The independent unit, that element which purchases and sells in the markets. Possible two basic versions such are at first sight represented Systems. We can assume or that the competitiveness will exist only Between branches and each branch will act how if it was The set will be the uniform enterprise, or that in each branch The independent firms competing with one another. Only in this last form The given offer really leaves from it parts of objections against Centralised planning as that also puts own Problems. These problems have extremely interesting character. Here with ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|