![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 64x64, 48x48, 40x40, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: icon no, marvel legends icons spiderman, lost the show desktop icon, icons browser, fashion style iconBesides distinction in requirements, ethics and logic absolutely differently approach to statement of the purposes. The logician can be devoted to the purpose, however from it (no less than with other members of team) he does not consider the consent obligatory. «I should not take a liking to you to work together with you» — here a liked introduction of logicians. Ethics such approach is capable to horrify. After all the mission of the purpose for it is an establishment of harmony on a workplace and organisation rallying in the uniform command. Obviously, ethics and logic it is necessary to search for the compromise: logicians should recognise that ethics feel requirement for enough harmonious working atmosphere while ethics should understand, what not each purpose needs to like for the sake of its achievement. But despite similar distinctions in styles, both those and others can reach much.As approach to statement of the purposes it and it Despite all that we spoke till now about statement of the purposes, this process nevertheless in each aspect rests against such pair of preferences, as "rationality-irrationality". After all at this level of idea find a practical embodiment. On the one hand, this pair preferences from all four most obviously influences our way of life. So if you it you live it, methodically and measuredly, and your style of speech can be characterised as directive and self-confident. And if you concern to it, your way of life differs flexibility, spontaneity and it, and speech is free and testifies to inquisitiveness. Hence, as statement of the purposes concerns decision-making processes, it offers obvious advantages more resolute it which can tell that have well spent day, only if they managed to put and reach a number of the purposes, both big, and small. One more cardinal distinction between them consists in propensity it to transform the purposes, leaning against again arriving information. For it this fascinating business and simultaneously the common sense certificate: eventually what for to aspire to the old purpose if circumstances have changed? But alas, it consider similar as a failure: after all you have laid down for yourselves the aim, but have not reached it. Therefore it it is possible to consider as quintessence of philosophy the following statement: «better effectively to reach the incorrect purpose, than in general to reach nothing». As we already spoke, it are quite capable of that with pleasure to work, moving to an incorrect direction. ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|