 |
|
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
|
 | ||||||||
|
 |
 |
|
 View Icon |
|
Add View icon to cartImage sizes: 256x256, 64x64, 48x48, 40x40, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16
File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO
Purchase entire Design Icon Set now! View Design Icon Set now!
Download demo icons
Tags: shakira icon, maker icon maker, icon of the dormition, emos icons, ichat icons
It is necessary to doubt that collectivisation of relations between the worker andProduct of its work includes costs, which at an estimation of factory system It is necessary to write down in the debit.
The factory system has appeared also incompatible with practice, when workers
Possessed instruments of labour. Essential feature of this system that Great number of workers share, at least, a part Capacities, and in practice almost all equipment is used In common. From the very beginning in sharing there were buildings
Factories, their water wheels or steam engines, system of pulleys and axes for
Transfers of movement to machine tools. It was inevitable that the legal body possessing
The power equipment and building, possessed also machine tools. Historically Otherwise could not be because separate workers simply did not possess
Means for acquisition of machine tools, and, besides, accounting of the limiting
Costs and the incomes, previous acquisition of each machine tool, should
The property of workers on instruments of labour is important from the point of view of the economic
Efficiency as workers are inclined to care better about personally it The belonging tool. Marx gave to this circumstance very big Significance. He saw in it main objection against capitalism, confirming,
To the master, and is faster to the pupil or even - to the slave. The worker who is not possessing tools
The work, has been named by the proletarian, from the Latin term proletarius - not
Having properties, that is why carried to the most lowest class of company
The Roman citizen. At the time of Marx did not consider that, though hired workers
Had no own instruments of labour, they could possess other sort
The property. The understanding of it has come later. Like other intellectuals
Its time, Marx considered that the factory has without delay lowered the status of the independent
The handicraftsman, than has raised the status of a class which never possessed tools
Work - and in general possessed nothing.
Associations and other forms of the group property in the same way, as well as
Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved.
|
More info
