![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 64x64, 48x48, 40x40, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: despised icon youtube, rhythim icon, icon phile, how to change icons in xp, icons about friendshipAs cope with logic and ethics conflictsWe would like to begin conversation with discussion of logiko-ethical pair preferences as are convinced that it in exhaustive degree covers the most important distinctions under the authority of conflicts. Even in the most simple dialogue the requirement of the logician for objectivity and clearness can give to dialogue such foreshortening which it will immediately regard as animosities display. Remember, after all it aspires to make decisions so that they as much as possible promoted harmony. For example, the logician, only aspiring to bring clearness in business, ethics can ask: «That you wish to tell it?» It in the answer will take of a defensive position, having seen in this question the sharp requirement, and in the answer will tell: I "do not know", «It is not necessary so to be angry» or «It is unimportant». Any of these answers will not give logic of that clearness whom he searches, but any of them will force it to strengthen pressing for reception of desirable result: «As you can not know, what you mean?» Or: «I am not angry at all, simply I should understand that you mean». Or: «it is very important, because it is a question on which it is necessary for us to be defined with launching sites». In reply to it it will take offence even more strongly and can quite blurt out something like the following: «You can understand it as it is necessary for you». In turn, the logician will definitively finish its words: «Well, give not we will so burn!» That began as simple searches of clearness, can turn all for pair seconds to the present quarrel which both participants will begin to puzzle over how it it was possible so quickly to open operations. To illustrate, distinctions in styles of settling of the conflict of logicians and it are how much important, we invited absolutely strangers, married couples, managers, working collectives and even the whole boards of directors and divided them on "logic" and "ethics" categories. We gave to each group a series of experimental exercises to highlight distinctions in their methods of the resolution of conflicts, and wrote down on the big sheet their answers to following questions: ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|