![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 16x16, 20x20, 24x24, 32x32, 48x48, 256x256 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: karolina kurkova icons, vintage style icons, docklet icons, lord of the rings livejournal icons, glittering iconsWe make, when we have conversation on the state or company, language or the market,-- With that only a difference that in a science we in the obvious form express all that in Ordinary speech is present it is hidden and it is indistinct. I have no possibility to explain it on an example any of the theoretical Social disciplines - even on an example unique from them, economic Theories where the competence would suffice me. For this purpose it would be required to me much more It is more than time, than I possess, on technical details. Probably, However that it is much more useful to try to make it on an example mainly Descriptive and in any sense of mainly empirical discipline from Social sphere - namely stories. It will be especially pertinent to consider The nature Uistorichesky it, as those who wish to make the public Sciences more Unauchnymiy, constantly advise to social scientists to address behind the The facts to history and to use Uistorichesky it as replacement The experimental. Really, outside of social studies became, Apparently (especially among it2), almost standard that the historical The method is a lawful way to generalisations concerning social it3. What do we mean under Ufaktomy of history? Whether the facts, from which are The mankind history, important for us as the physical facts or consists in Any other sense? That itself fight at Waterloo represents, board Louis XIV in France or feudal system? Probably, we will promote Forward, if instead of undertaking directly this question, we will ask, what In the image we decide, whether any separate particle available at us makes Information a part of Ufaktay - Ubitva at Vaterlooy? Whether there was a person ploughing The field directly behind extreme flank of guards of Napoleon, a part of Ubitvy at - ? Or the gentleman who has dropped a snuffbox at news about storm of the Bastile, - Part of Ufrantsuzsky Revoljutsiiy? Immersing in this sort of questions will show, At least, one: we cannot define a historic fact in terms Existential co-ordinates. Not everything that occurs in same Time in the same place, is a part same historical The fact, no less than all components of the same historic fact not Necessarily should concern the same time and a place. Classical Greek language or the organisation of the Roman legions, Baltic Trade of a XVIII-th century or general law evolution, or any movement any Armies - all is historic facts where no physical criterion can To prompt to us, what components of the given fact and as they are connected Together. Any attempt to define them should take the form of the mental Reconstructions - the models which elements form giving in to judgement Individual installations. Undoubtedly, in most cases the model will be so ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|