![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 128x128, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: aptana studio icon, os x store icons, icons in the task bar, desktop icons background, iamx icons- It is possible to exclude children, possibly, the majority of women and manyFor example, if at Dzhandera the head has been broken or pressed inside Thorax. I think, it is hard for making to the one who is not so strong. The nobility, can Dimachek was mistaken? - Any person at all could not make it, - Deniel has told. - Why? - You, of course, know that a robot skeleton metal and it is ready More strong human bones. Our movements it is stronger, faster and more exact The attack of the person would be easily reflected. Even the strongest person Presence of the person. Otherwise we could not execute the functions. - But, Deniel, tells the Third Law: "the Robot should protect itself, if This protection does not contradict the First and Second Laws ". The second Law Speaks: "the Robot should obey orders of the person, if fulfilment of these Orders does not contradict the First Law ". And under the first Law:" the Robot not Can damage to the person or the inactivity to admit, that to the person Harm "has been done. The person can order to destroy to the robot itself, and then The robot itself will multiply to itself a head. And if the person attacks on the robot, that not Can reflect attack, without having damaged the person, and it will be infringement of the First The law. - You, I believe, think of terrestrial robots. On the Aurora and others External The worlds robots more difficult, versatile and more valuable. The third Law at Than them is much stronger than the Second. The order on self-destruction should be It is rather supported by the lawful reason - obvious danger. And at Attack reflexion the First Law will not be infringed - Aurora robots are able To stop the person, without having damaged it. - Let's assume, the person will assure that if the robot will not destroy Itself(himself) it will be destroyed, the person? - The Avrorsky robot will call into question the simple assertion of the such Sorts. Clear evidence of possible destruction of the person Is required. ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|