![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image sizes: 256x256, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16 File formats: BMP, GIF, PNG, ICO ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tags: explotion images, image capture visual, vertical images, microsoft vista icons, mri images of the kneeCapitalist era concerns only XVI century. There, where it comes,For a long time already the serfdom is destroyed, and the brilliant page has faded The Middle Ages - sick cities ". K.Marx and F.Engels, Compositions, 2 it., - . 23. With. 728] Dobb, for example, asserts that if to define capitalism as New way of manufacture at which the capital is extensively involved in Manufacture process "or in the mature form of relations between the capitalist and Hired workers, or in less developed form of submission working on To the house of handicraftsmen to the capitalist who delivers raw materials and buys up the ready Production "[Dobb, Studies in the Development of Capitalism, p. 18], such Sorts the system can be tracked only from the end of XVI century [in the same place and Thomas (Rise of Western World, p. 144 - 145) carry system occurrence, at Which home-workers make products from raw materials of the intermediary which markets End-product, to the Netherlands XVI centuries.] if to see the feudalism end in Formation of regular armies in XV century it will turn out that feudalism decline Has come to the end hundred years prior to capitalism origin. Thus, at us Two hundred year's rupture between the beginning of decline of feudalism (or more than hundred is formed Years from end of an epoch of feudalism) and only the lifting beginning Capitalist way of manufacture. It this period names "Transitive". ["Actually... And it is very important for adequate understanding Transition, decomposition of a feudal way of manufacture has come enough Far before the capitalist way of manufacture, and this has developed Decomposition proceeded out of communication with growth of a new way of manufacture. Two The centuries dividing times of Edward III and Elizabeth, definitely were The transitive. "(In the same place, with. 20)] Clearly that, as consistently confirms Suizi, this transition period "not Was a simple mix of capitalism and feudalism: Dominating elements were not neither feudal, nor capitalist" [Sweezy, Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism, p. 15]. This statement raises unpleasant enough for Marxist methodology ![]()
| Copyright © 2006-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved. |
|